Chapter 4: Literature review practice for managerial intellectual
learning
Managerial intellectual learning (MIL)
relies heavily on literature review. In this regard, some literature review is
a leisure reading activity, sometimes to intellectually explore management
topics to make an overall grasp of them, while at other times to gain a deeper
understanding of a specific management topic. More often than not, the
literature review exercise is carried out as an agile literature review for
specific applied business research projects or managerial problem-solving to
address a particular management concern in the real-world setting, see Table 1.
The literature review exercise is attentive to developing a sophisticated
understanding of a chosen management topic, see Table 2:
Table 1: A practice guide on the agile literature review approach
| 
The
  steps | 
Tasks
  and deliverable | 
Relevant
  resources and support | 
| 
Step 1
  - ideas search | 
Tasks 
·     
  Identify relevant key words on the
  formulated management topic statement
  that responds to the management concern
  statement made Literature search 
·     
    
·     
  Browsing and screening contents found 
·     
  Ideas snowballing 
Deliverable 
A folder for storing the relevant literature, primarily in pdf form | 
·     
  Suggestions of relevant academic ideas
  for key word search from academic advisors and supervisors 
·     
  Library facility, notably e-library for
  accessing academic publishers' websites | 
| 
Step 2 -
  ideas collection | 
Tasks 
·     
  Collect ideas from the literature and
  save them into one or more documents on different topics 
·     
  Quick reading of the literature
  materials collected from Step 1 
Deliverable 
A set of study notes on a
  chosen set of topics | 
·     
  Computer 
·     
  Brief evaluative comments and advice on
  the content of the study notes from
  academic advisors and supervisors 
·     
  e-resources on study notes [for
  illustration] | 
| 
Step 3
  - ideas categorization | 
Task 
·     
  Review ideas on each study note on a
  particular topic and group the ideas from the study note into a number of
  categories that are relevant for addressing one or two management concerns
  under examination 
Deliverable 
A set of categories
  for grouping the ideas in each study note | 
·     
  e-resources on cognitive mapping-based
  literature review 
·     
  e-resources on mind mapping-based
  literature review 
·     
  e-resources on coding in qualitative
  research | 
| 
Step 4
  - ideas systemic diagramming | 
Task 
·     
  Link up idea categories to produce a
  theoretical framework/ ideas systemic diagram 
Deliverable 
A theoretical
  framework/ ideas systemic diagram | 
·     
  e-resources on theoretical framework 
·     
  e-resources  on systemic diagramming 
·     
  e-resources on coding in qualitative
  research | 
Table
2: Examples of statements on management concerns and associated management
topics
| 
Management concern statements 
Characteristics 
·     
  Concerns/ issues-focused 
·     
  Expressed in the language of the client
  system's world 
·     
  Felt by one or  more stakeholder groups in an
  organizational setting | 
Management topic statements 
Characteristics 
·     
  Solutions/evaluation-focused 
·     
  Expressed in the language of the academic
  world 
·     
  Felt by the researcher to be relevant for
  working out some recommendations with good actionable value | 
| 
Examples on management concern statements | 
Examples on management topic statements | 
| 
Example 1: Product range of  the company too narrow and mature [felt by
  the senior management of the company] | 
To evaluate and strengthen
  the innovation capability of the
  company. | 
| 
Example 2: Company's staff in low morale due
  to  the poor organizational atmosphere
  associated with the upcoming business process outsourcing [felt by the senior
  management and the employees of the company] | 
To evaluate how the organizational atmosphere of the
  company affects its employee morale
  and the resultant employees' job performance. | 
| 
Example 3: Salesmen unwilling to share customers'
  information with their colleagues in their company [felt by the owner of the
  business] | 
To evaluate and strengthen
  the teamwork  of the company so as to improve customer satisfaction. | 
| 
Example 4: Some managers considered too harsh to
  their subordinates [felt by some of the company's middle managers] | 
To evaluate and improve the management styles and leadership styles found in the company. | 
| 
Example 5: The  middle managers and their subordinates  of the company are considered unwilling
  to  learn and adopt innovative ideas
  [felt by the top management of the company] | 
To evaluate how the existing corporate culture of the company
  affects its innovation capability. | 
There are a number of four distinguishing
characteristics of the literature review practice for MIL, however. They are:
1. Strongly rely on using
diagramming techniques to construct theoretical frameworks in the literature
review exercise.
2. Strongly prefer to underline
the systemic nature of the theoretical frameworks constructed via the
literature review exercise.
3. Willing to construct an array
of theoretical frameworks, some primarily as an academic exercise focusing on the
management topic per se, while others as knowledge structure with actionable
value to address specific management concerns in a particular organizational
setting.
4. Favour to conduct the
literature review based on critical systems thinking.
In short, literature review in
MIL serves the twin purposes of (a) intellectual learning to build up
managerial competence and (b) applied business research and associated
managerial problem-solving. Its time-frame can be short-term or long-term.
Further readings
Ho,
J.K.K. 2014. "A Review of the Multi-perspective, Systems-based (MPSB)
Research with an MPSB Knowledge Supply Chain Framework" European Academic
Research 2(1) April: 705-729.
Ho
J.K.K. 2017. "On the agile literature review approach for practising
managers: a proposal" Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley [to
be published]. 
Ho JKK. 2017. "Cognitive mapping for literature
review ebook 2017" April 16, Joseph
KK Ho publication folder (URL address:
http://josephkkho.blogspot.hk/2017/04/cognitive-mapping-for-literature-review.html).
[visited at July 28, 2017].
Ho,
J.K.K. 2017. "Some additional conceptual clarification of the recently
proposed agile literature review approach (ALRA)" Joseph KK Ho e-resources
October 28 (url address:
http://josephho33.blogspot.hk/2017/10/some-additionalconceptual.html).
 
No comments:
Post a Comment