A dialogue with Chatgpt (accessed via poe.com) to come up with a tailer-made dissertation proposal: a note for MBA students
The following is the dialogue record:
First question: "I am a part-time MBA student, currently working on the formulation of my final-year dissertation project. Due to my unpleasant experience of being laid off by my previous employer as a result of the poor corporate merger process, I am interested in researching on the two related research themes of "the main factors that lead to corporate merger failures" and "the negative consequences of poor corporate merger implementation". Two additional dissertation considerations are that (i) I would like to employ the research philosophy of pragmatism for my project investigation and (ii) I have to rely on mainly studying publicly available secondary data (e.g. business magazines, published statistics and annual reports) for my investigation though a small-scale interview research is still feasible. Based on these personal consideration of mine, could you come up with a research plan for me to consider? Tks for your effort in advance."
Reply from Chatgpt: "Certainly! Here’s a structured research plan for your dissertation project on corporate merger failures and their negative consequences, incorporating your personal considerations.
Research Plan
1. Title
Exploring the Factors Leading to Corporate Merger Failures and Their Negative Consequences: A Pragmatic Approach
2. Research Objectives
To identify the main factors that contribute to corporate merger failures.
To analyze the negative consequences arising from poorly implemented mergers.
To provide practical recommendations for improving merger processes based on findings.
3. Research Questions
What are the key factors that lead to failures in corporate mergers?
What negative consequences do organizations experience as a result of poor merger implementation?
How can organizations mitigate these risks in future mergers?
4. Research Philosophy
Pragmatism: Focus on practical outcomes and solutions, emphasizing the importance of both qualitative and quantitative data to inform decisions.
5. Methodology
Data Collection:
Secondary Data: Gather information from publicly available sources including:
Business magazines (e.g., Harvard Business Review, Fortune)
Published statistics (e.g., financial databases, industry reports)
Annual reports of companies involved in mergers
Primary Data: Conduct a small-scale qualitative interview study with:
Industry experts
Former employees of companies that have undergone mergers
Data Analysis:
Thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews.
Content analysis of secondary data to identify common themes and patterns related to merger failures.
6. Literature Review
Review existing literature on corporate mergers, focusing on:
Factors contributing to merger failures (e.g., cultural clashes, inadequate due diligence, poor communication).
Consequences of failed mergers (e.g., financial losses, employee turnover, reputational damage).
Identify gaps in the literature that your research can address.
7. Timeline
Phase Duration
Literature Review 4 weeks
Data Collection 6 weeks
Data Analysis 4 weeks
Writing Dissertation 6 weeks
Review and Finalization 2 weeks
8. Expected Outcomes
A comprehensive understanding of the factors leading to merger failures and their consequences.
Practical recommendations for organizations to enhance merger success rates.
Contribution to the academic discourse on corporate mergers.
9. Potential Challenges
Accessing relevant secondary data.
Securing participation from interview subjects.
Maintaining objectivity while analyzing qualitative data.
10. Conclusion
Emphasize the significance of understanding merger dynamics for both practitioners and scholars in the field of business management.
This plan should provide a solid foundation for your dissertation project, aligning your personal experiences with your research interests while adhering to academic requirements. Good luck!"
My second question: "Tks; if I am going to use the quantitative data analysis techniques of multiple regression analysis to study data from the annual reports about how some factors from the annual reports as well as other external contextual statistics influence business performance before and after merger, what would this research design method looks like?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "Certainly! Here’s a detailed research design method for using multiple regression analysis to study the impact of various factors on business performance before and after a merger.
Research Design Method
1. Title
Examining the Impact of Merging Factors on Business Performance: A Multiple Regression Analysis Approach
2. Research Objectives
To quantify how specific factors from annual reports and external contextual statistics influence business performance pre- and post-merger.
3. Research Questions
What internal factors from annual reports (e.g., financial metrics, management commentary) significantly influence business performance?
How do external contextual factors (e.g., market conditions, economic indicators) affect merger outcomes?
What is the relationship between these factors and business performance metrics before and after a merger?
4. Hypotheses
H1: Internal financial metrics from annual reports positively influence business performance post-merger.
H2: External economic indicators negatively impact business performance post-merger.
H3: There is a significant interaction effect between internal and external factors on business performance.
5. Data Collection
Sample Selection:
Select a sample of companies that have undergone mergers within a specific time frame (e.g., last 5-10 years).
Variables:
Dependent Variable: Business performance metrics (e.g., revenue growth, profit margins, stock performance).
Independent Variables:
Internal factors from annual reports (e.g., revenue, operating income, ROI).
External contextual factors (e.g., GDP growth, industry growth rates, unemployment rates).
Data Sources:
Annual reports for financial metrics.
Publicly available economic statistics from government agencies and industry reports.
6. Data Analysis Techniques
Descriptive Statistics: Summarize the data to understand the distribution and central tendencies of variables.
Multiple Regression Analysis:
Use a regression model to assess the relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable.
Model structure:
Performance=𝛽0+𝛽1(Internal Factors)+𝛽2(External Factors)+𝜖
Performance=β 0 +β1 (Internal Factors)+β 2 (External Factors)+ϵ
Assumptions: Check for linearity, independence, homoscedasticity, and normality of residuals.
Statistical Software: Use software like SPSS, R, or Python for analysis.
7. Analysis Steps
Conduct a preliminary analysis to clean and prepare the data.
Run descriptive statistics to understand the dataset.
Perform multiple regression analysis to identify significant predictors of business performance.
Evaluate the model fit using R-squared and adjusted R-squared values.
Conduct hypothesis testing for each variable.
8. Expected Outcomes
Identification of key internal and external factors influencing business performance post-merger.
A clear understanding of the relationships between these factors and performance metrics.
Recommendations for practitioners based on empirical findings.
9. Limitations
Availability of accurate and consistent data across different companies.
Potential omitted variable bias if significant factors are not included in the model.
Assumptions of regression analysis may not hold in all cases.
10. Conclusion
Summarize findings and suggest implications for corporate strategy during mergers.
This research design method will allow you to rigorously analyze the factors influencing business performance in the context of mergers, providing valuable insights for both academic and practical applications."
My third question: "Another question is: What key themes should I focus on during my literature review?"
The reply from Chatgpt is: "For your literature review on corporate merger failures and their negative consequences, consider focusing on the following key themes:
Key Themes for Literature Review
Factors Leading to Merger Failures
Cultural Integration: Examine how cultural differences between merging organizations can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings.
Due Diligence: Discuss the importance and impact of thorough due diligence in identifying potential risks.
Strategic Misalignment: Investigate how differences in strategic goals can result in failed mergers.
Communication Issues: Analyze how poor communication during and after the merger can affect employee morale and operational success.
Consequences of Poor Merger Implementation
Financial Performance: Review studies that analyze the financial impacts of failed mergers, including shareholder value and profitability.
Employee Turnover: Explore the effects of merger-related changes on employee retention and turnover rates.
Customer Impact: Assess how mergers can affect customer satisfaction and loyalty, potentially leading to market share loss.
Reputational Damage: Investigate how failed mergers can harm the corporate reputation of the involved companies.
The Role of Leadership in Mergers
Change Management: Examine the role of leadership in managing change and guiding employees through the merger process.
Decision-Making: Analyze decision-making processes that can contribute to either the success or failure of mergers.
External Contextual Factors
Market Conditions: Discuss how economic conditions, competitive landscape, and regulatory environments influence merger outcomes.
Industry Trends: Explore how industry-specific trends impact the success of mergers and acquisitions.
Theoretical Frameworks
Mergers and Acquisitions Theories: Review relevant theories such as the Resource-Based View (RBV), Transaction Cost Economics, and Agency Theory.
Pragmatism in Mergers: Discuss how a pragmatic approach can inform better practices and strategies in mergers.
Empirical Studies and Case Analyses
Case Studies of Successful and Failed Mergers: Review empirical research that analyzes specific mergers, drawing lessons from both successes and failures.
Quantitative Analyses: Look for studies that employ quantitative methods to assess merger outcomes, which can provide insights into measurable impacts.
Recommendations and Best Practices
Guidelines for Successful Mergers: Summarize best practices and recommendations from the literature for effectively managing mergers.
Future Research Directions: Identify gaps in the existing literature that your research could address, particularly related to your focus on multiple regression analysis.
Conclusion
By focusing on these themes, you will create a comprehensive literature review that not only highlights existing knowledge but also identifies gaps and sets the stage for your own research contributions."
My fourth question: "What are some effective methods for analyzing case studies of failed mergers as reported from magazines, newspapers and academic journals?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "Analyzing case studies of failed mergers using sources like magazines, newspapers, and academic journals can provide valuable insights. Here are some effective methods for conducting this analysis:
1. Content Analysis
Define Categories: Create categories based on themes such as cultural integration, financial performance, leadership decisions, and external factors.
Coding: Systematically code the qualitative data from articles to identify patterns and commonalities in the reasons for failure.
Frequency Counts: Quantify how often certain themes or factors are mentioned across different sources.
2. Comparative Analysis
Select Cases: Choose a few specific failed mergers for in-depth analysis.
Compare and Contrast: Identify similarities and differences in factors leading to failure, such as leadership styles, industry conditions, or merger strategies.
Highlight Lessons Learned: Extract key lessons and recommendations from these comparisons.
3. Thematic Analysis
Identify Themes: Read through the case studies and identify recurring themes related to failures.
Detailed Descriptions: Provide detailed descriptions of each theme and illustrate with examples from the case studies.
Contextualization: Discuss how these themes relate to broader concepts in merger theory and practice.
4. Narrative Analysis
Storytelling Approach: Analyze the narrative structure of the case studies, focusing on how the story of the merger is presented.
Identify Key Events: Highlight critical events, decisions, and turning points that contributed to the failure.
Perspectives: Consider different stakeholder perspectives (e.g., management, employees, customers) presented in the articles.
5. SWOT Analysis
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats: Conduct a SWOT analysis for each merger case, focusing on internal and external factors that contributed to the failure.
Visual Representation: Create visual representations to summarize findings and facilitate comparison between cases.
6. Root Cause Analysis
Identify Causes: Use techniques like the "5 Whys" or fishbone diagrams to drill down to the root causes of merger failures.
Categorize Findings: Group causes into categories such as organizational culture, financial misjudgments, or strategic misalignments.
7. Quantitative Analysis (if applicable)
Data Extraction: If available, extract quantitative data related to financial performance, employee turnover, or market share before and after the merger.
Statistical Testing: Use statistical methods to analyze the impact of identified factors on performance metrics.
8. Expert Interviews
Conduct Interviews: If feasible, supplement your analysis with interviews from industry experts or employees involved in the mergers.
Triangulation: Use insights from interviews to validate and enrich your findings from secondary sources.
9. Framework Application
Apply Theoretical Frameworks: Utilize relevant theoretical frameworks (e.g., Transaction Cost Economics, Agency Theory) to analyze how these theories explain the failures.
Critical Evaluation: Critically evaluate how well the frameworks account for the complexities observed in the case studies.
Conclusion
Using these methods will enable a thorough and nuanced analysis of failed mergers, drawing insights from various sources to contribute to your understanding of the factors that lead to merger failures."
My fifth question: "What are common themes found in failed merger case studies?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "Common themes found in failed merger case studies often highlight the complexities and challenges organizations face during mergers. Here are some key themes:
1. Cultural Clashes
Differences in Organizational Culture: Merging companies often have distinct cultures that can lead to conflicts, misunderstandings, and employee dissatisfaction.
Resistance to Change: Employees may resist new practices or changes imposed by the merging organization, impacting morale and productivity.
2. Poor Communication
Inadequate Information Sharing: Lack of clear communication regarding goals, changes, and expectations can create confusion and distrust among employees.
Failure to Engage Stakeholders: Neglecting to involve key stakeholders in the merger process can lead to resistance and lack of buy-in.
3. Inadequate Due Diligence
Failure to Identify Risks: Insufficient investigation into financial, operational, or legal aspects can result in unexpected liabilities.
Overestimation of Synergies: Companies may overestimate the benefits of the merger without fully understanding the challenges involved.
4. Strategic Misalignment
Conflicting Goals and Objectives: Merging organizations may have differing visions or strategic priorities, leading to confusion and inefficiency.
Lack of Clear Integration Strategy: A poorly defined integration plan can result in chaos and missed opportunities for synergies.
5. Leadership Issues
Ineffective Leadership: Poor leadership during the merger process can lead to lack of direction and loss of confidence among employees.
Decision-Making Failures: Delayed or misguided decisions can exacerbate challenges and lead to further complications.
6. Financial Mismanagement
Cost Overruns: Mergers can lead to unexpected costs that were not anticipated during the planning stages.
Decline in Financial Performance: Post-merger financial metrics may decline due to integration challenges or market reactions.
7. Customer and Market Impact
Loss of Customer Confidence: Mergers can lead to customer uncertainty regarding service continuity or product quality.
Market Share Decline: Competing firms may capitalize on the instability caused by the merger, resulting in loss of market share.
8. Regulatory and Compliance Issues
Antitrust Concerns: Regulatory scrutiny can delay or block mergers, creating uncertainty and added costs.
Non-compliance Risks: Failure to address regulatory requirements can lead to legal challenges post-merger.
9. Integration Challenges
Operational Disruptions: Integrating systems, processes, and teams can lead to significant operational challenges and disruptions.
Talent Retention Issues: Key employees may leave due to uncertainty, dissatisfaction, or cultural misalignment.
10. External Economic Factors
Market Conditions: Unfavorable economic conditions at the time of the merger can exacerbate integration difficulties and impact performance.
Industry Trends: Changes in industry dynamics can affect the relevance and success of the merger strategy.
Conclusion
These themes provide valuable insights into the complexities of mergers and the common pitfalls organizations should avoid to enhance the likelihood of success. Understanding these themes can inform better practices in future merger endeavors."
My sixth question: "What are some of the useful management theories relevant for informing the research design and, subsequently, for analysis on the findings?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "Several management theories can inform your research design and analysis of findings related to corporate merger failures. Here are some relevant theories:
1. Transaction Cost Economics (TCE)
Overview: Focuses on the costs of conducting transactions within an organization and between organizations.
Application: Helps analyze why firms choose to merge and the costs associated with integrating different entities. Useful for assessing due diligence and integration challenges.
2. Resource-Based View (RBV)
Overview: Emphasizes the importance of valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable resources in achieving competitive advantage.
Application: Can be used to evaluate how the combined resources of merging firms contribute to or detract from performance. Helps identify what resources are critical for a successful merger.
3. Agency Theory
Overview: Examines the relationship between principals (owners) and agents (managers), focusing on issues of accountability and alignment of interests.
Application: Useful for understanding potential conflicts between management and shareholders during mergers, particularly in decision-making processes.
4. Change Management Theories
Overview: These theories (e.g., Kotter's 8-Step Change Model, Lewin's Change Management Model) outline how to effectively implement organizational change.
Application: Inform strategies for managing cultural integration and employee resistance during mergers. Can guide your analysis of leadership effectiveness.
5. Strategic Management Theories
Overview: Includes frameworks like SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, and Porter’s Five Forces, which help evaluate the strategic context of mergers.
Application: Useful for assessing strategic alignment, competitive advantage, and external factors influencing merger success or failure.
6. Cultural Integration Theories
Overview: Focus on the importance of organizational culture in mergers (e.g., Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory).
Application: Helps analyze cultural differences and integration challenges, providing insights into employee behavior and satisfaction post-merger.
7. Chaos Theory
Overview: Suggests that systems are highly sensitive to initial conditions and that small changes can lead to unpredictable outcomes.
Application: Useful for understanding the complexities and unpredictability of merger processes, particularly in the face of unforeseen challenges.
8. Stakeholder Theory
Overview: Focuses on the importance of all stakeholders in organizational decision-making rather than just shareholders.
Application: Can guide your analysis of how different stakeholder interests (employees, customers, suppliers) are impacted during mergers and inform strategies for engagement.
9. Integration Management Frameworks
Overview: Frameworks like the Integration Management Office (IMO) model outline best practices for managing merger integration.
Application: Provides a structured approach to analyzing the integration process and identifying key success factors.
10. Systems Theory
Overview: Views organizations as complex systems with interrelated parts that must work together effectively.
Application: Useful for analyzing how different components of the merged organizations interact and affect overall performance.
Conclusion
Incorporating these management theories into your research design and analysis will provide a robust framework for understanding the factors contributing to merger failures and offer insights into best practices for future mergers."
My seventh question: "What would be the specific questions and steps to employ when linked to pragmatism in this case?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "When employing a pragmatic approach to your research on corporate merger failures, it's essential to ask specific questions and follow structured steps that align with pragmatic principles. Here’s a framework for both:
Specific Questions
What practical problems are associated with corporate merger failures?
Focus on identifying real-world issues that organizations face during mergers.
What factors contribute to the success or failure of mergers as observed in case studies?
Aim to gather insights from existing literature and case studies.
How do different stakeholders perceive the impact of merger failures?
Investigate the views of employees, management, customers, and investors.
What actionable strategies can be derived from the analysis of failed mergers?
Seek practical recommendations that organizations can implement in future mergers.
How do contextual factors (e.g., market conditions, industry trends) influence merger outcomes?
Explore how external conditions can affect the success or failure of mergers.
What lessons can be learned from both successful and failed mergers?
Assess both sides to inform future practices.
Steps to Employ Pragmatism
Define the Research Problem
Clearly articulate the issues related to corporate merger failures that you want to address. Focus on practical implications.
Literature Review
Conduct a thorough review of existing literature on merger failures, emphasizing practical findings and real-world examples.
Data Collection
Secondary Data: Gather data from business magazines, newspapers, and academic journals focusing on case studies of failed mergers.
Primary Data: If feasible, conduct interviews with industry experts or stakeholders involved in mergers to gather firsthand insights.
Mixed Methods Approach
Use both qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze the data:
Qualitative Analysis: Identify themes and patterns from case studies and interviews.
Quantitative Analysis: If applicable, employ statistical methods (e.g., multiple regression analysis) to examine the impact of various factors on merger performance.
Analysis of Findings
Integrate findings from both qualitative and quantitative analyses to draw comprehensive conclusions about merger failures.
Focus on actionable insights that can inform practice.
Develop Practical Recommendations
Based on your findings, create a set of actionable recommendations for organizations to improve merger outcomes.
Iterative Reflection
Reflect on the research process and findings to assess their practical implications. Consider how they can be applied in real-world contexts.
Engage Stakeholders
Share your findings with relevant stakeholders (e.g., business leaders, policymakers) to discuss potential applications and gather feedback.
Conclude with Practical Implications
Summarize how your research contributes to understanding corporate mergers and offers solutions to common problems.
Conclusion
By framing your research within a pragmatic context, you focus on generating practical knowledge that can directly inform business practices. This approach emphasizes real-world implications, ensuring your research is relevant and applicable to current challenges in corporate mergers."
My eighth question: "Finally, what could be research ethical issues I need to pay attention to with the research methods I am going to use for my project, namely, quantitative and qualitative data analysis on desk research findings (i.e. from magazines, newspapers, annual reports and academic journals) as well as a small-scale interview research with my ex-colleagues on the topic of causes of merger failures and the negative consequences of merger failures?"
The reply from Chatgpt: "When conducting research involving both quantitative and qualitative methods—particularly with desk research and interviews—it's crucial to consider various ethical issues. Here are some key ethical considerations to keep in mind:
1. Informed Consent
Interviews: Ensure that participants (e.g., ex-colleagues) are fully informed about the purpose of the research, what their participation entails, and how their data will be used. Obtain their explicit consent before proceeding.
Documentation: Provide clear information in writing and, if necessary, a consent form for participants to sign.
2. Confidentiality and Anonymity
Data Protection: Safeguard the identity of interview participants by anonymizing their responses in your research. Avoid using names or identifying details in your reporting.
Confidential Sources: If using sensitive information from desk research (e.g., internal reports or proprietary data), respect confidentiality agreements or restrictions.
3. Voluntary Participation
Right to Withdraw: Participants should know that their involvement is entirely voluntary and that they can withdraw from the study at any time without consequence.
No Coercion: Ensure that participants do not feel pressured to participate or provide specific answers.
4. Potential Harm
Emotional and Psychological Impact: Be mindful of the potential for discussing sensitive topics (e.g., layoffs, corporate failures) to cause distress. Prepare to provide support or resources if needed.
Impact on Relationships: Consider how participating in the research might affect your relationship with ex-colleagues or their current employment situation.
5. Honesty and Integrity
Data Reporting: Ensure that all findings, including statistical analyses and qualitative insights, are presented honestly and accurately. Avoid fabricating or misrepresenting data.
Attribution: Properly attribute sources in your desk research, giving credit to original authors and publishers.
6. Bias and Objectivity
Researcher Bias: Be aware of your own biases and how they may influence data interpretation and analysis. Strive for objectivity in both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
Diverse Perspectives: Where possible, include a range of perspectives in your interviews to avoid a narrow viewpoint.
7. Ethical Approval
Institutional Review Board (IRB): If your institution has an IRB or ethics committee, seek approval for your research methods, especially for the interview component. This ensures adherence to ethical standards.
8. Use of Secondary Data
Copyright and Permissions: Ensure that you have the right to use any data, articles, or reports from magazines, newspapers, and journals. Follow copyright laws and obtain necessary permissions if required.
9. Reporting Results
Transparency: Be transparent about your methodology and any limitations of your study. Clearly state how findings are derived and acknowledge any conflicts of interest.
Conclusion
Addressing these ethical issues is essential for conducting responsible research. By adhering to ethical guidelines, you can enhance the credibility of your study while respecting the rights and well-being of all participants involved."
An additional exercise to produce a proposal as per the university proposal template format:
Certainly! Below is a structured dissertation proposal based on your research interests and the template provided.
MGTM05 MBA RESEARCH PROJECT MODULE
PROJECT PROPOSAL
Candidate Name: [Your Name]
Student Number: [Your Student Number]
Name of Supervisor: [Supervisor’s Name]
Project Title:
Exploring Factors Leading to Corporate Merger Failures and Their Negative Consequences
Agreed date of proposal submission:
[Submission Date]
Project Background:
Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are a common strategy employed by organizations to achieve growth, scale economies, and enhance competitive advantage. However, a significant percentage of mergers fail to deliver the anticipated benefits, resulting in financial losses, employee dissatisfaction, and reputational damage. This research is motivated by the personal experience of the candidate, who was affected by a merger failure, highlighting the need to understand the underlying causes and consequences of such failures.
Understanding the factors that lead to merger failures is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance their strategic positioning. This study will explore key themes such as cultural integration, communication issues, and inadequate due diligence, which have been identified in literature as common pitfalls. The findings will not only contribute to academic discourse but also provide practical recommendations for businesses, ultimately impacting their strategic decision-making processes and improving merger success rates.
Literature Review:
The literature review will cover critical aspects of corporate mergers, focusing on factors contributing to their success or failure. Key themes will include:
Cultural Clashes: Studies emphasize how differing organizational cultures can lead to integration challenges and employee resistance.
Communication Issues: Effective communication is identified as a crucial factor in mitigating misunderstandings during the merger process.
Due Diligence: Research indicates that inadequate due diligence can result in unforeseen liabilities and operational disruptions.
Leadership and Change Management: Effective leadership is essential for guiding organizations through the complexities of mergers.
Key sources will include academic journals, case studies, and industry reports that address these themes, highlighting critical issues that may arise during the merger process.
Objectives:
To identify and analyze the main factors leading to corporate merger failures.
To assess the negative consequences of poor merger implementation on organizational performance.
To provide actionable recommendations for organizations to improve their merger processes.
To contribute to the academic understanding of merger dynamics through empirical research.
Methodology:
This research will employ a mixed-methods approach, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Secondary data will be collected from publicly available sources, including business magazines, annual reports, and academic journals, focusing on case studies of failed mergers. Qualitative methods will involve conducting interviews with industry experts and former colleagues to gather insights on merger failures.
Quantitative analysis will utilize multiple regression techniques to examine the relationship between various factors (e.g., financial metrics, cultural integration) and business performance pre- and post-merger. This combination of methods will provide a comprehensive understanding of the research questions.
Time Plan
Key Activities Time-scale Resources required
Literature Review Weeks 1-4 Access to academic databases
Data Collection Weeks 5-10 Data sources, interview tools
Data Analysis Weeks 11-14 Statistical software (e.g., SPSS)
Writing Dissertation Weeks 15-20 Word processing software
Review and Finalization Weeks 21-22 Feedback from supervisor
Note: You must discuss the Ethics approval process with your supervisor at the earliest opportunity as approval is required before data can be collected. Details of the Research Ethics Review process can be found on the University website.
SUPERVISOR FEEDBACK SHEET
No comments:
Post a Comment