A collection of perplexity notes on Accounting and Finance

 A collection of perplexity notes on Accounting and Finance

1. A study note on the topic of capital structure.
2. A study note on the topic of dividend policy.
3. A study note on the topic of share buyback.
4. A study note on the topic of convertible shares.
5. A study note on the topic of perpetuity.
6. A study note on the topic of initial public offering.
7. A study note on the topic of board diversity.
8. A study note on the topic of CEO duality.
9. A study note on the agency theory; related to the literature review task./ also study the related guideline note.
10. Some exploratory literature review questions to ask.
11. Some examples of study using hypothesis testing and quantitative data analysis.

A collection of notes on perplexity usage

 Perplexity related collection

1. A collection of notes on Business Management
2. A collection of notes on Housing Studies
3. A collection of notes on Accounting and Finance.
4. Using perplexity to perform desk research.
5. How to firm up a dissertation proposal with perplexity.
6. A note on substantive theory vs formal theory.
7. A note on formative assessment vs summative assessment.
8. A note on contextualization.
9. A note on social facts.
10. A note on micro and macro theories
11. A note on verstehen in qualitative research.
12. A note on the middle class.
13. A study note on literature synthesis and conceptual framework construction.
14. A study note on scientific progress.
15. A study on the literature review at the individual theory level: guideline note.

A collection of blog notes on perplexity usage: for Housing Studies students

A collection of blog notes on perplexity usage: for Housing Studies students

1. An introduction to perplexity
2. On using perplexity to do literature search and desk research: housing affordability
3. A study note on historical geography for housing studies students.
4. A study note on political geography: for housing studies students.
5. A study note on economic geography: for housing studies students.
6. A study note on urban geography: for housing studies students.
7. A study note on visual methods in housing research.
8. A note on geographical imagination: for housing studies students.
9. A note on urban resilience.
10. A note on cultural geography for housing studies students.
11. A note on reflexivity in the domains of sociology and housing needs.
12. A note on sympathy as employed to study homelessness.
13. A note on transport geography.
14. A note on Gidden's structuration theory.
15. A note on domestic violence.
16. A note on the personal life perspective.
17. A note on the community development theory; related to the task of literature review. also study the related guideline note.
18. Some exploratory questions to ask for literature review: on home ownership preference.
19. Some examples of hypothesis testing and quantitative data analysis employed in academic journal articles.

A collection of blog notes on perplexity for the field of business management

 A collection of blog notes on perplexity for the field of business management

1. An introduction to perplexity
2. Using perplexity to do literature search: for wine marketing
3. Using perplexity to do literature search and desk research: on the leadership style of gen y.
4. A study note on the septuagenarian consumers
5. A study note on workplace well-being.
6. A note on the academic field of advertising.
7. A note on the impacts of AI on HRM.
8. Raising questions to perplexity to support formulation of a proposal: on merger failures.
9. Raising questions to perplexity to support formulation of a proposal: on change leadership.
10. A note on the Hong Kong retail sector.
11. An exploratory exercise to study the topic of the travel agency sector.
12. A note on employee turnover.
13. A note on self-actualization in HRM.
14. A note on organizational trust in HRM.
15. A note on green marketing.
16. A note on critical systems thinking.
17. A note on role theory.
18. A note on geopolitical risk in strategic management.
19. A note on the concept of organizational ethos.
20. A note on "the consequences of modernity" in consumer marketing.
21. A note on modern self-identity in consumer marketing.
22. A note on "working from home" in business management.
23. A note on the environmental protection strategy in the maritime industry.
24. A note on the diamond model; related to the task of literature review. also study the related guideline note.
25. Some exploratory literature review questions to ask.

Asking chatgpt to illustrate a research approach: a note

Asking chatgpt (accessed via poe.com) to illustrate a research approach: a note

My question 1: "I am learning the subject of research methods; I have difficulty to understand the topic of research approach. Could you provide an example of research approach in the form of a diagram for illustration? Tks a lot."

The reply from chatgpt: "I can't create a diagram directly for you, but I can explain a common research approach and guide you on how to visualize it.

Example of a Research Approach: Quantitative Research

Define the Research Question: Start by identifying what you want to study.

Literature Review: Review existing literature to understand the context and previous findings.

Hypothesis Formation: Develop a hypothesis based on the literature.

Research Design: Choose a research design (e.g., survey, experiment).

Data Collection: Collect numerical data using structured methods.

Data Analysis: Analyze the data using statistical methods.

Interpretation: Draw conclusions based on the data analysis.

Reporting: Write a report detailing the research process and findings.

Suggested Diagram Structure

You can visualize this in a flowchart format:

Start: Research Question

↓

Literature Review

↓

Hypothesis Formation

↓

Research Design

↓

Data Collection

↓

Data Analysis

↓

Interpretation

↓

Report Findings

↓

End"

My question 2: "Tks for information. In this case, could you also give an example of a research approach: qualitative research? Tks."

The reply from chatgpt: "Certainly! Here’s an overview of the qualitative research approach, along with a suggested structure for visualizing it.

Example of a Research Approach: Qualitative Research

Define the Research Question: Identify the topic or phenomenon you want to explore.

Literature Review: Review relevant literature to understand existing theories and contexts.

Research Design: Choose a qualitative method (e.g., interviews, focus groups, observations).

Participant Selection: Select participants who can provide rich, detailed insights.

Data Collection: Gather data through open-ended questions and discussions.

Data Analysis: Analyze the data thematically, identifying patterns and meanings.

Interpretation: Interpret the findings in the context of the research question.

Reporting: Present the results with quotes and narratives to illustrate key points.

Suggested Diagram Structure

You can visualize this in a flowchart format:

Start: Research Question

↓

Literature Review

↓

Research Design

↓

Participant Selection

↓

Data Collection

↓

Data Analysis

↓

Interpretation

↓

Report Findings

↓

End"

Reference: a collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.

Asking chatgpt to clarify the terms of research philosophy, research approach, research methodology, and research method: a note for MBA students

Asking chatgpt (accessed via poe.com) to clarify the terms of research philosophy, research approach, research methodology and research method: a note for MBA students

My question 1: "As an MBA student, I have some difficulty to tell the differences as well as relationship between these terms: research philosophy, research approach and research method. Could you clarify for me, with regard to my research project that makes use of pragmatism (the research philosophy) to study the sales representatives' job performance of ABC Ltd, with the main application of academic motivation theories? Could you use examples based on my research project ideas to do the clarification? Tks."

The reply from chatgpt: "Certainly! Understanding the distinctions and relationships between research philosophy, research approach, and research method is crucial for conducting effective research. Let's clarify these terms in the context of your project on sales representatives' job performance at ABC Ltd, using pragmatism as your research philosophy.

Research Philosophy

Definition: Research philosophy refers to the underlying belief system that guides how research is conducted. It shapes the way researchers interpret data and understand the world.

In Your Project: Since you are using pragmatism, your research philosophy emphasizes practical outcomes and real-world applications. This means you will focus on what works best to understand and improve the job performance of sales representatives, considering both qualitative and quantitative data.

Example: You might explore both the quantitative performance metrics (like sales figures) and qualitative insights (like employee feedback) to create a comprehensive view of job performance.

Research Approach

Definition: The research approach outlines the strategy and plan for how to conduct the research, typically categorized into three types: deductive, inductive, and abductive.

In Your Project: Given your pragmatic philosophy, you may choose a mixed-methods approach (often associated with pragmatism). This allows you to combine both deductive reasoning (testing specific motivation theories against your findings) and inductive reasoning (developing new insights from the data collected).

Example: You could start with existing academic motivation theories (like Maslow's hierarchy of needs) to form hypotheses about what motivates sales representatives. Then, you could gather data through surveys and interviews to see if these theories hold true in your specific context at ABC Ltd.

Research Method

Definition: Research methods are the specific techniques and procedures used to collect and analyze data. This includes qualitative methods (like interviews or focus groups) and quantitative methods (like surveys or experiments).

In Your Project: You will select methods that align with your mixed-methods approach to gather and analyze both types of data.

Example:

Quantitative Method: You might develop a survey to measure sales performance metrics and motivation levels among sales representatives.

Qualitative Method: You could conduct interviews or focus groups to gain deeper insights into the motivations behind their performance and how they perceive their roles.

Summary of Relationships

Research Philosophy (Pragmatism): Guides your overall approach to understanding the performance of sales reps in a practical and outcome-focused manner.

Research Approach (Mixed Methods): Determines how you will combine qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis.

Research Method (Surveys and Interviews): Specifies the actual tools and techniques you will use to gather data.

By aligning these three components effectively, you can create a robust framework for your research project, ensuring that your findings are meaningful and applicable to the real-world context of ABC Ltd."

My question 2: "I remember that some references suggest that the classification of research approach includes qualitative research, quantitative research and mixed methods research. Now you mention that research approach is classified into the inductive approach, the deductive approach and the abductive approach. So which classification scheme should I use to classify research approaches?"

The reply from chatgpt: "The classification of research approaches can indeed vary based on different contexts and frameworks. Here's a breakdown of how the two classification schemes relate to each other:

1. Types of Research Approaches

Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods:

Qualitative Research: Focuses on understanding phenomena through in-depth exploration of subjective experiences, often using methods like interviews, focus groups, and content analysis.

Quantitative Research: Involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to identify patterns, test theories, and establish relationships, typically using surveys and experiments.

Mixed Methods Research: Combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem.

2. Reasoning Approaches

Inductive, Deductive, and Abductive Approaches:

Inductive Approach: Starts with observations and develops theories based on patterns identified in the data. Commonly used in qualitative research.

Deductive Approach: Begins with existing theories or hypotheses and tests them through data collection. Often associated with quantitative research.

Abductive Approach: Combines elements of both inductive and deductive reasoning. It starts with an incomplete set of observations and seeks the best explanation, often leading to new theories.

Choosing a Classification Scheme

Context Matters: The choice of classification scheme depends on the specific goals of your research. If your focus is on the methodology used for data collection and analysis, then the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods classification may be more relevant.

Integration of Approaches: In many cases, researchers integrate both classifications. For example, you might use a mixed methods approach that incorporates both inductive and deductive reasoning.

In Your Research Project

For your project on sales representatives' job performance at ABC Ltd:

Methodology Classification: You can classify your overall approach as mixed methods since you are collecting both qualitative and quantitative data.

Reasoning Classification: You may employ both inductive reasoning (to explore new insights through qualitative data) and deductive reasoning (to test existing academic motivation theories with quantitative data).

Conclusion

Ultimately, both classification schemes are valid and useful. You can choose one based on your research focus, but integrating insights from both can enhance your understanding and approach to your research project."

My question 3: "Lastly, what is the difference between research approach and research methodology?"

The reply from chatgpt: "The terms "research approach" and "research methodology" are often used interchangeably, but they refer to different aspects of the research process. Here’s a breakdown of their differences:

Research Approach

Definition: The research approach refers to the overall strategy or plan that guides the selection of specific methods and techniques for conducting research. It encompasses the reasoning process (inductive, deductive, or abductive) and the type of data collection (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods).

Key Characteristics:

Focus: The overarching framework for how research will be conducted.

Types: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, and reasoning approaches (inductive, deductive, abductive).

Purpose: Helps determine how researchers will investigate their research questions and objectives.

Research Methodology

Definition: Research methodology refers to the specific procedures, techniques, and tools used to collect and analyze data within the chosen research approach. It provides a detailed plan for how the research will be executed.

Key Characteristics:

Focus: The specific methods and procedures used in the research process.

Components: Includes techniques for data collection (e.g., surveys, interviews), sampling methods, data analysis techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, thematic analysis), and ethical considerations.

Purpose: Provides a clear, systematic framework for conducting the research and ensures that the study is replicable and valid.

Summary of differences

In Your Research Project

For your project on sales representatives' job performance at ABC Ltd:

Your research approach might be mixed methods, combining qualitative and quantitative data collection, and employing both inductive and deductive reasoning.

Your research methodology would detail how you will conduct surveys to gather quantitative data and carry out interviews for qualitative insights, including specific sampling strategies and data analysis techniques.

Understanding these distinctions will help you design and articulate your research more effectively."

My question 4: "Could I say that research methodology discussion can cover in more procedural details more than one research method to use in a dissertation project within the context of one type of research approach, while a research method to use deals with more specific details on how specific data is to be collected and analyzed using such a particular research method?"

The reply from chatgpt: "Yes, that's a clear and accurate way to differentiate between research methodology and research methods! Here’s a breakdown of your points:

Research Methodology

Scope: Research methodology encompasses a broader discussion that includes the overall strategy for the research project. It can cover multiple methods within the context of a single research approach.

Procedural Details: This section can outline various methods you might consider using (e.g., qualitative interviews, quantitative surveys, case studies) and the rationale for selecting them based on the chosen research approach (e.g., mixed methods).

Flexibility: It allows for the exploration of different methodologies to understand how they can be applied to answer the research questions effectively.

Research Method

Specificity: A research method focuses on the detailed, specific techniques used for data collection and analysis within the chosen methodology.

Procedures: This includes how you will implement a particular method (e.g., designing a survey, conducting interviews), how you will sample participants, and how you will analyze the data collected (e.g., statistical analysis for quantitative data, thematic analysis for qualitative data).

Execution: It deals with the practical steps required to carry out the chosen method effectively.

Summary

So, to summarize:

Research Methodology discusses the broader strategy and may include various methods that align with a particular research approach.

Research Method provides the specific details on how to collect and analyze data using a selected method.

This distinction is helpful in structuring your dissertation and ensuring clarity in how you present your research design."

Diagram 1: On the relatedness of research philosophy, research approach, research methodology and research method

Diagram 2: research methodology: an illustration

My version

** also study the note on research approach. The second one is on research method design.

Reference: a collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.

Asking chatgpt to produce a proposal about consumer behavior: a note for MBA students

Asking chatgpt to produce a proposal about consumer behavior: a note for MBA students

My question 1: "I am a part-time MBA student, currently working on my dissertation proposal. My research theme is to examine "The Impact of Changes in Contemporary Consumer Eating Behavior on Hong Kong’s Mid-Range Catering Industry and Corresponding Marketing Strategies adopted in response". For this dissertation project, I will employ questionnaire survey, with convenience sampling to my friends, to learn their opinion with regard to consumer eating behavior associated to my research theme. I will also employ semi-structured interview with three of my friends, who are professionals in the catering industry, covering their views on marketing adaptation in response to the changing consumer eating behavior. The third research method is desk research to gain some contextual knowledge about my research theme. The overall research philosophy is pragmatism. I will employ some theories from the subject of consumer behaviour (notably related to consumer decision-making), industry analysis (e.g. the 5-Force Model of Michael Porter) and marketing strategy. Based on these ideas from me, could you produce a proposal for me? Tks."

The reply from chatgpt: "Sure! Here’s a structured dissertation proposal based on your outlined research theme:

Dissertation Proposal

Title

The Impact of Changes in Contemporary Consumer Eating Behavior on Hong Kong’s Mid-Range Catering Industry and Corresponding Marketing Strategies Adopted in Response

Introduction

The catering industry in Hong Kong, particularly the mid-range segment, is experiencing significant shifts due to evolving consumer eating behaviors. This dissertation aims to explore how these changes impact the industry and the marketing strategies that businesses employ to adapt.

Research Objectives

To identify and analyze contemporary consumer eating behaviors in Hong Kong.

To assess the impact of these behaviors on the mid-range catering industry.

To examine the marketing strategies adopted by the catering industry in response to these changes.

Research Questions

What are the key changes in consumer eating behavior in Hong Kong?

How do these changes affect the mid-range catering industry?

What marketing strategies are being implemented by catering businesses to adapt to these changes?

Research Methodology

1. Questionnaire Survey

Population: Friends and acquaintances, representing a diverse cross-section of consumers.

Sampling Method: Convenience sampling.

Data Collection: Online survey distributed via social media platforms to gather quantitative data on consumer preferences, habits, and attitudes related to eating out.

2. Semi-Structured Interviews

Participants: Three professionals within the catering industry.

Purpose: To gain qualitative insights into industry perspectives on marketing adaptations.

Interview Structure: Open-ended questions focusing on experiences, challenges, and strategies in response to changing consumer behaviors.

3. Desk Research

Objective: To provide contextual knowledge and background on consumer behavior trends, industry analysis, and marketing strategies.

Sources: Academic journals, industry reports, market analysis, and news articles related to the Hong Kong catering industry.

Research Philosophy

The research will adopt a pragmatic philosophy, focusing on practical implications and real-world applications of findings. This approach allows for a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Theoretical Framework

Consumer Behavior Theories: Examination of decision-making processes and factors influencing consumer choices.

Industry Analysis: Application of Porter’s Five Forces Model to analyze competitive dynamics within the mid-range catering sector.

Marketing Strategy: Exploration of strategic frameworks to identify effective responses to changing consumer demands.

Expected Outcomes

A detailed analysis of consumer eating behaviors in Hong Kong.

Insights into how these behaviors influence the mid-range catering industry.

Recommendations for effective marketing strategies tailored to evolving consumer preferences.

Conclusion

This research will contribute to understanding the interplay between consumer behavior and marketing strategies in the context of Hong Kong's mid-range catering industry. Findings will be valuable for industry stakeholders aiming to navigate the changing landscape and enhance their competitive edge.

Feel free to modify any sections or add specific details that you think might enhance your proposal!"

My question 2: "Could you tell me what are the practical and academic value of this study, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the research methods and research philosophy involved?"

The reply from chatgpt: "Certainly! Here’s an overview of the practical and academic value of your study, along with the strengths and weaknesses of your research methods and philosophy.

Practical Value

Industry Insights: The study will provide valuable insights for the mid-range catering industry in Hong Kong, helping businesses understand consumer preferences and adapt their marketing strategies accordingly.

Marketing Strategies: By identifying changes in consumer eating behavior, the research can help caterers develop targeted marketing strategies that resonate with contemporary consumers, potentially leading to increased customer engagement and sales.

Consumer Awareness: The findings may also educate consumers about their own eating behaviors and choices, fostering a greater awareness of how these choices impact the catering industry.

Academic Value

Contribution to Literature: The study will contribute to the existing literature on consumer behavior and marketing strategies in the context of the catering industry, particularly in a unique market like Hong Kong.

Theoretical Application: By applying theories such as the 5-Force Model and consumer decision-making frameworks, the research will enhance understanding of how these theories operate in real-world scenarios.

Methodological Insights: The use of mixed methods (surveys, interviews, desk research) can provide a comprehensive approach to studying consumer behavior, offering a model for future research in similar areas.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methods

Questionnaire Survey

Strengths:

Ability to gather quantitative data from a larger sample quickly.

Can identify trends and patterns in consumer eating behavior effectively.

Weaknesses:

Convenience sampling may lead to bias, as it relies on a non-representative sample.

Limited depth of responses; may not capture nuanced opinions.

Semi-Structured Interviews

Strengths:

Provides qualitative insights and richer data regarding professional perspectives on marketing strategies.

Flexibility allows for exploration of unexpected topics during interviews.

Weaknesses:

Small sample size may limit generalizability of findings.

Data analysis can be time-consuming and subjective.

Desk Research

Strengths:

Access to a wealth of existing information and theories, providing context and background.

Cost-effective and time-efficient compared to primary data collection.

Weaknesses:

Potential for outdated or biased information.

May not address specific, contemporary issues directly related to your study.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Philosophy (Pragmatism)

Strengths

Flexibility: Pragmatism allows for the use of multiple methods, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem.

Focus on Practical Outcomes: Emphasizes practical implications and real-world applications of research findings, which is valuable in a business context.

Weaknesses

Potential Lack of Depth: The focus on practical outcomes may overlook deeper theoretical insights or complexities in consumer behavior.

Ambiguity in Methodology: The flexibility of pragmatism can lead to inconsistencies in the methodological approach, making it challenging to maintain rigor.

Conclusion

Your study on the impact of changes in consumer eating behavior on Hong Kong’s mid-range catering industry promises both practical and academic value. While the chosen methods have their strengths and weaknesses, the pragmatic philosophy will enable a comprehensive exploration of the topic, balancing theoretical insights with practical applications.".

My question 3: "Could you provide with a more concrete research method design, for each of my research methods to use: i.e. questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview and desk research? Tks."

The reply from chatgpt: "Certainly! Here’s a more concrete research method design for each of your research methods: questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview, and desk research.

1. Questionnaire Survey

Objective: To gather quantitative data on contemporary consumer eating behaviors and preferences in Hong Kong.

Design:

Target Population: Friends and acquaintances in Hong Kong who represent diverse demographics (age, gender, income level).

Sampling Method: Convenience sampling, inviting participants through social media and personal networks.

Sample Size: Aim for at least 100-150 responses to ensure diversity and statistical relevance.

Questionnaire Structure:

Section 1: Demographic Information

Age

Gender

Occupation

Income Level

Section 2: Eating Behavior

Frequency of dining out (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly)

Types of cuisine preferred (e.g., local, international, fast food, healthy)

Influencing factors on dining choices (e.g., price, convenience, health considerations)

Section 3: Attitudes and Preferences

Importance of sustainability and health in food choices (scale of 1-5)

Willingness to try new dining experiences (Yes/No)

Preferred channels for discovering new restaurants (social media, recommendations, advertisements)

Section 4: Feedback and Suggestions

Open-ended question for additional comments on dining preferences and experiences.

Data Analysis:

Use statistical software (e.g., SPSS, Excel) to analyze quantitative data, looking for trends and correlations.

2. Semi-Structured Interviews

Objective: To gain qualitative insights from industry professionals regarding marketing strategies in response to changing consumer behaviors.

Design:

Participants: Three professionals in the catering industry (e.g., restaurant managers, marketing directors).

Recruitment: Approach contacts within your network or use LinkedIn to identify potential interviewees.

Interview Structure:

Introduction: Brief overview of the study and the purpose of the interview.

Questions:

How have you observed changes in consumer eating behavior in recent years?

What strategies have you implemented to adapt to these changes?

How do you gather feedback from customers about their dining experiences?

What role does social media play in your marketing strategies?

Can you share an example of a successful marketing initiative that responded to consumer trends?

Conclusion: Ask for any additional insights or suggestions they might have regarding the industry.

Data Collection:

Conduct interviews in-person or via video calls (e.g., Zoom).

Record interviews (with consent) for accurate transcription and analysis.

Data Analysis:

Use thematic analysis to identify common themes and insights from the interviews.

3. Desk Research

Objective: To gather contextual knowledge and existing literature on consumer eating behaviors and marketing strategies.

Design:

Data Sources:

Academic journals (e.g., journals on consumer behavior, marketing, and hospitality).

Industry reports (e.g., market research reports on the catering industry in Hong Kong).

Government publications (e.g., statistics on dining trends and consumer spending).

Online articles and blogs focusing on trends in the food and beverage industry.

Research Process:

Literature Review: Conduct a systematic review of existing literature related to consumer behavior, focusing on trends specific to Hong Kong.

Market Analysis: Analyze industry reports to understand market dynamics, competition, and consumer preferences.

Trend Identification: Identify key trends in eating behavior, such as preferences for healthy eating, sustainability, and convenience.

Synthesis of Findings: Organize and synthesize information to support your research objectives.

Documentation:

Maintain a bibliography of all sources used for easy referencing in your dissertation.

Conclusion

This concrete research method design outlines a clear approach for each of your methods, ensuring that you collect comprehensive data to address your research theme effectively. Each method complements the others, providing both quantitative and qualitative insights into the impact of contemporary consumer eating behavior on the mid-range catering industry in Hong Kong."

My question 4: "Could you advise what research ethics issues I need to deal with for doing this project?"

The reply from chatgpt: "When conducting your research project, it's important to address several key research ethics issues to ensure the integrity of your study and the protection of your participants. Here are the main ethical considerations to keep in mind:

1. Informed Consent

Requirement: Ensure all participants are fully informed about the purpose of the research, what their participation involves, and how their data will be used.

Implementation: Provide a consent form outlining this information, and obtain written or verbal consent before they participate in surveys or interviews.

2. Confidentiality and Anonymity

Requirement: Protect the identity and personal information of participants.

Implementation: Ensure that data is collected and stored securely, and anonymize responses in your analysis and reporting to prevent identifying individuals.

3. Right to Withdraw

Requirement: Participants should have the right to withdraw from the study at any time without any consequences.

Implementation: Clearly communicate this right to participants during the consent process.

4. Data Protection

Requirement: Comply with data protection laws, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) if applicable.

Implementation: Implement secure storage measures for data, limit access to authorized personnel, and ensure that data is only used for the stated research purposes.

5. Avoiding Harm

Requirement: Ensure that participation in the study does not cause physical or psychological harm to participants.

Implementation: Consider the sensitivity of the topics discussed and be prepared to provide support or resources if participants experience discomfort.

6. Honesty and Integrity

Requirement: Conduct research honestly and report findings accurately.

Implementation: Avoid fabrication or manipulation of data, and disclose any conflicts of interest.

7. Ethical Approval

Requirement: Depending on your institution's policies, you may need to seek ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics committee.

Implementation: Prepare an ethics application detailing your research methods, participant recruitment, and how you will address the above ethical issues.

8. Cultural Sensitivity

Requirement: Be aware of and respect cultural differences, especially in a diverse city like Hong Kong.

Implementation: Tailor your approach to accommodate cultural norms and sensitivities, particularly in interviews.

Conclusion

Addressing these ethical issues is crucial for the credibility of your research and the trust of your participants. By implementing these practices, you can conduct your study with integrity and respect for those involved."

Note: The student should spend time to do preliminary literature review to provide more concrete literature review findings to inform the dissertation proposal design.

** note: This example is on the academic-oriented type of dissertation project.

Reference: a collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Family Business-related

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Family Business-related

1. A review of an academic article (sept 18a)
2. A review of an academic article (sept 18b)
3. Asking chatgpt to derive a research proposal (sept 29a)
4. Asking chatgpt to derive a research proposal (sept 29b)

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Industrial Relations-related

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Industrial Relations-related

1. A review of an academic article (sept 16a)
2. A review of an academic article (sept 18a)
3. A review of an academic article (sept 19a).
4. Asking chatgpt to derive a proposal (sept 29a).
5. Asking chatgpt to derive a proposal (sept 29b).

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Marketing-related

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Marketing-related

1. An academic article reviewed (sept14a)
2. An academic article reviewed (sept15a)
3. An academic article reviewed (sept15b)
4. Asking chatgpt to derive a proposal from an article: Sept 28.

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Organizational culture and cross-cultural management-related

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Organizational culture and cross-cultural management-related

1. A review of an academic article (#1)
2. A review of an academic article (#2)
3. A review of an academic article (#3)
4. A review of an academic article (#4)
5. A review of an academic article (#5)
6. A review of an academic article (#6)
7. A review of an academic article (#7)
8. A review of an academic article (#8)

A collection of blog notes about AI tools usage: Strategic Management-related

A collection of blog notes about ChatGPT (also chatpdf.com and pdf-summarizer): Strategic Management-related

1. A review of an academic article (note 1)
2. A review of an academic article (note 2)
3. A review of an academic article (note 3)
4. A review of an academic article (note 4)
5. A review of an academic article (note 5).
6. A review of an academic article (note 6).

A collection of blog notes about AI tools: Leadership and Change Management-related

A collection of blog notes about ChatGPT (also chatpdf.com and pdf-summarizer): Leadership and Change Management-related

1. A review of an academic article (note 1)
2. A review of an academic article (note 2)
3. A review of an academic article (note 3)
4. A review of an academic article (note 4)
5. Asking chatgpt to derive a proposal: Oct 1a.
6. Asking chatgpt to derive a proposal: Oct 1b.